VERITAS CI

Compliance Infrastructure for Digital Payments
Identity, audit logs and payment classification secured on-chain.

Explore Live Demo Hub Request Partnership / Pilot Access

VERITAS CI Demo Tutorial

A guided walkthrough of the full compliance workflow and audit tools

Why VERITAS Exists

Global digital payments are fragmented by compliance barriers. Businesses are forced to use multiple systems for KYC, payroll tax classifications, vendor payments, AML reporting, and audit verification. VERITAS solves this by being an infrastructure layer. Not a payroll provider, not a custodian, but a compliance and identity engine that sits beneath any payment system. Like Stripe standardized online payments, VERITAS standardizes regulatory trust.

Core Utilities

Verified Business NFTs (KYB)

Employee & Wallet Identity Mapping

Payment Classification Engine

Certified IRS/AML Audit Trail

Mission & Vision

VERITAS is an independent compliance infrastructure for digital payments. Our mission is to enable global businesses to transact on-chain with the same regulatory clarity, auditability, and legal certainty expected of traditional finance. We do not custody funds or operate as a payroll provider, processor, or exchange. Instead, we deliver the verification, classification, and audit framework that financial systems build on top of. VERITAS is standardizing trust for decentralized commerce.

Corporate Contact

Veritas Compliance Systems
Compliance & Infrastructure Division
Telegram (Business Inquiry): https://t.me/Stinbo
Email (Partnerships): veritas.partnerships@outlook.com

Workflow Preview

Verify Entity
Issue Employee NFTs
Execute Payments
Generate Compliance Logs
Export IRS/AML Audit

View Workflow Demo

Real-World Use Cases

Click a scenario to see how things go wrong without VERITAS — then flip the story to see how the same situation plays out when every payment, identity, and audit log is secured on-chain.

Flip the story outcome

Scenario – “The Remote Dream Turns Into a Tax Nightmare”

A U.S. startup hires engineers and designers in the UK, Germany, and Brazil. To move fast, the founder pays everyone in USDC directly from a multi-sig wallet. There’s no consistent tracking of who is an employee vs contractor, no standardized contracts, and each accountant in each country gets a different spreadsheet.

For two years, the company grows. Then a routine review triggers an inquiry: the UK engineer appears as a “contractor” but is functionally an employee; in Germany, social contributions weren’t correctly categorized; in Brazil, cross-border tax treatment is inconsistent. Regulators ask for:

Proof of identity and status for every wallet.
Classification of each payment (wage, bonus, grant, vendor, etc.).
Audit-ready logs linking on-chain transfers to legal entities and contracts.

The startup can’t provide a unified ledger. They scramble through CSV exports, exchange histories, and Google Sheets. Within months, they receive:

Back-tax assessments and penalties in multiple jurisdictions.
Blocked bank relationships due to “unstructured crypto payroll.”
A delayed funding round as investors request clarity on contingent liabilities.

Result: growth stalls, lawyers and accountants get paid instead of talent, and every new international hire feels risky.

Flip the story outcome

Scenario – “Crypto Vendor Chaos”

A gaming studio pays dozens of artists, composers, and developers in USDC and SOL. Vendors are spread across the U.S., Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia. Payments fly out of a treasury wallet with brief memos like “art drop” and “music pack.”

At year-end, the finance lead tries to reconcile:

Which wallets are U.S. vendors needing 1099s.
Who is an incorporated business vs an individual freelancer.
Which payouts qualify as royalties, which as services, which as bonuses.

Exchanges begin flagging large aggregate outflows to “unknown beneficiaries.” One major partner bank asks for enhanced due diligence. When the company can’t clearly prove who got paid for what and under which tax treatment, the bank quietly sunsets the relationship.

Result: the studio spends months reconstructing payment histories; tax filings are late; future banking partners are skeptical of “on-chain vendor payment experiments.”

Flip the story outcome

Scenario – “Great On-Chain Revenue, Zero Underwriting Trust”

A DeFi-enabled fintech app processes millions of dollars in on-chain volume each month. All revenue is visible in public wallets, but none of it is normalized for a traditional lender: there are no standard merchant IDs, no clear separation of customer funds vs protocol fees, and no mapped entity structure.

The company approaches a credit fund for a growth facility. The fund’s team looks at:

Unlabeled wallet flows on chain.
Self-reported dashboards built in spreadsheets.
No independent attestation that those flows belong to a licensed entity.

Result: the lender passes. The business is “interesting,” but the data is too noisy, too self-reported, and too fragile to support a sizable credit line.

Flip the story outcome

Scenario – “DIY RWA Meets Regulatory Wall”

A logistics company decides to “tokenize invoices” to improve liquidity. They upload PDFs to a cloud drive, mint generic NFTs that point to those files, and offer them on a marketplace as “invoice-backed assets.”

Nothing encodes:

The legal entity behind each invoice.
The jurisdiction and governing law for the receivable.
Who is allowed to hold or trade the tokenized claim.

When they speak to their bank and legal counsel, the feedback is immediate:

Potential unregistered securities exposure.
No standardized risk classification or investor eligibility checks.
No clear audit trail if an invoice is disputed or repaid early.

Result: the pilot is shut down. The idea was right; the infrastructure was not.

Regulatory Engagement Roadmap

Veritas is being positioned as a neutral compliance infrastructure for digital payments. Our objective is to support regulated actors — not replace them — by standardizing identity, attestation, and audit logic beneath banks, payroll providers, fintech platforms, DAOs, and digital asset issuers. Below are the planned filings and briefing commitments for interoperable compliance development.

U.S. IRS Digital Asset Division

Technical standard for wage and vendor classification using on-chain attestations.

Preparing Evidence Set

FinCEN Innovation Office (No-Action)

Request that Veritas be treated as a compliance layer, not a money service business (MSB).

Drafting

BSA/AML Attestation Framework

Framework enabling enterprises to store proofs of AML compliance on-chain for regulators.

In Documentation

EU MiCA Conformity Scope

Mapping Veritas attestations as a service layer for MiCA-regulated payment providers.

Scope Review

FAQ

Answers to technical, legal and business questions

Open FAQ

VERITAS CI

VERITAS CI Demo Tutorial

Why VERITAS Exists

Core Utilities

Mission & Vision

Workflow Preview

Real-World Use Cases

Global Payroll Compliance for Remote Teams

On-Chain Vendor Payments With Tax Classification

Decentralized Credit Line Backed by Verified Revenue

Regulated RWA & Invoice Tokenization for Businesses

Regulatory Engagement Roadmap

FAQ